They Are Not Like Us — by Jack Harper


By Jack Harper — via Darkmoon.me June 7, 2014

Edited and presented with pictures, captions, and an endnote by Lasha Darkmoon on the sexual proclivities of the Jews.

“Basically, I estimate that about seventy percent of the present crisis on this planet can be fairly attributed to the machinations of Neanderthal-Semitic elements of the human population against the Cro-Magnon majority.”  — Michael Bradley, Esau’s Empire

Quite independent of Arthur Koestler, whose work he had never read, Michael Bradley, a Canadian-based  writer of Jewish origin, released his own 1978 work, The Iceman Inheritance, followed up by its sequel, Chosen People From the Caucusus. In both these books, Bradley put forth his thesis that the modern day people known as the Jews were descendants from the Khazars and that, indeed, the Khazars could trace their origins back to the Neanderthals.

Bradley’s website at michaelbradley.info describes Bradley’s findings in part: In Chosen People from the Caucasus, Bradley focuses on the two separate groups of people who came from the Caucasus Mountains of the Middle East: the Biblical Hebrews who emerged from the southern Caucasus between 3000-2000 BC to invade Palestine, and the northern Caucasus “Khazars” who were converted to Judaism about 740A.D.

The Khazars were pushed into Central and Eastern Europe by Mongol invasions, and their descendants comprise the vast majority of modern Jewry. Although these have no direct historical or genetic connections with the Semitic Jews of the Holy Land, both groups shared a Neanderthal origin in the Caucasus Mountains in the far distant pre-Judaic past.

Bradley contends that people and cultures emerging from the Caucasus Mountains — a known refuge of late lingering Neanderthal populations — in proto-historical and historical times, would have remained highly intelligent, highly aggressive and psychosexually maladapted, promoting a high level of in-group cohesion. These traits, Bradley contends, explain the survival of Biblical Hebrews against all odds and also the inordinate social influence of modern Western Jews.

Bradley contends that there is no mystique of “the chosen people.” Monotheism— a purely male and abstract Godhead— is merely a result of Neanderthal glacial physical and mental adaptations or “maladaptations.”

Proven Neanderthal in-group cohesion and extreme aggression together resulted in a fiercely parochial “chosen people” perspective.

The cultural fusion of the two separate streams of “Jews” has, since the 16th century, played an important role in the evolution of Western Civilization and thus in the molding of the entire world’s present cultural profile.

Bradley contends that a uniquely high level of lingering Neanderthal aggression, perpetuated by ethnic prohibitions against outside marriage, has been responsible for the major role played by those calling themselves Jews in the discovery and conquest of the Americas, the transatlantic trade in Black Africans as slaves and cultural colonization of non-Whites by the West. It has been a role too often distorted and disguised by loud lamentations of “anti-Semitism.”

Bradley writes further of his own research and the subsequent controversy that erupted when many media outlets (and Jewish sources) which had previously hailed his writing on the topic of the Neanderthals came to realize that his work pointed toward Neanderthal origins for the Jewish people:

The “Jewish” Ashkenazim had come from a region of known late-lingering Neanderthals, the Caucasus Mountains and the neighboring Russian steppes. Some typically “Jewish” physical traits were very obviously vestigial Neanderthal ones – generally a short stature and a plump physique, many very short wide-hipped and big- breasted women, extremely hairy men and a tendency toward beetling brows and large beaky “hooked” noses in both genders. Many Ashkenazim have crinkly-curly head hair tending toward dark reddish brown or mahogany in color.

Neanderthal type male.

Neanderthal type male.

Among Ashkenazi “Jews” there is also a genetic tendency toward beaky faces, not only just noses, and big mouths (in more ways than one) that “wrap around” the lower face.

Barbara Streisand and Julia Roberts provide two lovely and very well known examples of how attractive this genetic trait can be. But these are not “Semitic” physical traits. They are Neanderthal physical characteristics. And maybe some Neanderthal emotional and behavioral traits persisted among the Ashkenazim along with the physical ones.

Their “chosen people” pretension is a typical Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic racist predisposition against all other humans. It is a genetically determined “us against them” mentality. Their higher level of known Neanderthal aggression against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional social influence wherever they have settled in the West. . . .

The Ashkenazi Jews, as a group, exhibit lingering Neanderthal traits most strongly among living Caucasians because of Jewish prohibitions against marriage with outsiders. Their Neanderthal genes have been kept “all in the family”, as it were. These Neanderthal genes were not diluted by intermarriage nearly as much as with most other Caucasians.

Neanderthal type female

Neanderthal type female

This Russian steppe origin of today’s Ashkenazi “Jews” was not just a “theory” based on squibs by medieval Christian, Moslem and Jewish chroniclers. It was solid and objective historical reality based on linguistics and hard archaeological artifacts.

And, with The Iceman Inheritance, my unforgivable crime had been to add very persuasive anthropological data to all the other evidence. And this “data” was also something that anyone could actually see by simply taking a close look at many North American “Jews.”

According to Bradley, the Neanderthal heritage of modern-day Jewish people explains much about their ongoing problems with not only the native people of Palestine but with other people on the planet. He writes:

This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward emotional instability and hysteria when they feel nervous or threatened… which is all the time when they are not in absolute control. And they are arrogant, but uneasy, even then.

An ethnic symptom of this emotional instability is the Jewish tendency toward hypochondria. Even they cannot control death. This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward hysteria and emotional instability has proved to be a dangerous and tragic situation over the course of Western history.

Their aggression encourages continual Jewish attempts to control societies, while the emotional instability makes it difficult for most Jews to distinguish reasonably between justified social criticism by their non-Jewish neighbors and attacks.

Insensitive even to objective concerns about inordinate Jewish influence in societies, and reacting with hysterical aggression to any such supposed “attack” on their behavior and pleas from non-Jews to limit it, Jews have always provoked violence against themselves. And then they, with much emotional satisfaction, feel victimized and attribute the situation to innate “anti-Semitism” among their neighbors.

On his website, in an essay entitled “A frightening publication history of Jewish media suppression”, Bradley explores the amazingly negative reaction against his writings and the determined efforts to discredit his work.

—-

Endnote: On the sexual proclivities of Jews
by Lasha Darkmoon

This is related tangentially to the above article. It poses the question: are the Jews’ Neanderthal genes, which account for their double-than-average rate of aggression,  also responsible for their high libido and sexual hyperactivity?

It has always been an “antisemitic canard”, or perception among anti-Semites, that Jews are given to excessive amounts od lechery compared to non-Jews. The “Jew as Lecher” featured frequently in Nazi Germany Der Stürmer cartoons showing the Jew lusting after young Aryan women. When the Jews took over Weimar Germany, they flooded the country with pornography and made it the most sexually decadent country in Europe. Today, Jews dominate the world porn industry and produce roughly 90 percent of American porn in the San Fernando Valley, California. (Seehere)

Again, the Talmud’s obsession with sex is well-known. I have dealt with this subject in great detail in my article, Secret Sex Life of the Jews.  Amazingly, the Talmud has to be the only religious text in the world to discuss and compare the penis size of its most venerated sages.  (See  The Passionate Talmud, Introduction, p. 1).

The Jewish appetite for non-Jewish women, especially blondes, is apparently insatiable. All these appear to be Neanderthal characteristics — a huge libido, excessive testosterone, seething aggression — with the hairy Neanderthal-type male lusting darkly after the Cro-Magnon type female with her regular features and honeyblond flesh.

“I have not yet met a Jewish guy who wasn’t a horny rabbit,” porn star Nina Hartley once revealed. Nina should know, being Jewish herself — and having kicked up her heels for endless legions of lecherous Jews during her lubricious life time.

Here is Jewish novelist Philip Roth, who would undoubtedly have Neanderthal genes, going into raptures over the physical charms of Cro-Magnon woman. This is his hymn to the Aryan Blond Goddess from Portnoy’s Complaint:

“But the shiksas, ah, the shiksas are something else…. I am so awed that I am in a state of desire beyond a hard-on. My circumcised little dong is simply shriveled up with veneration…. How do they get so gorgeous, so healthy, so blond?” 

THE LUST OF NEANDERTHAL MAN FOR CRO-MAGNON WOMAN

The_neanderthal_man_1953

To learn more about Bradley’s Neanderthal thesis and the far-reaching effects of Neanderthal genes on the Jewish psyche, see: Chapter 4. The Decline and Fall of Esau’s Empire.

Source: ( Click Here )

 

Anti Semitism has Respectable Pedigree


by Henry Makow Ph.D — henrymakow.com June 1, 2014

In a quote from Colliers Magazine, November 26, 1938, Einstein continues: "The Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world."

The Nazis gave anti Semitism a bad name. Perhaps this was their purpose.

Their crude propaganda, racism and genocide made it despicable. But, anti Semitism had a long and important tradition before the Nazis. It has always represented resistance to an evil and alien political, cultural and economic domination. It deserves a rethink.

I will begin by stating my assumptions.

1. The truth is so simple, it staring us in the face. Yet we can’t see it. Most Jews and Christians are unaware that Judaism is not a religion, but a satanic cult masquerading as a religion.

Judaism is not defined by the Old Testament but by the Cabala which says God is formless and unknowable. This is the essence of Satanism. The essence of any true religion is that God is knowable. How else do we obey his voice in our soul/conscience? The Cabalist says god is unknowable because he wants to be God. “The Jew” is the physical manifestation of God. The “unknowable” God filters down until His Will manifests with the Rabbi. Cabala is the basis of Satanism and the Occult throughout history. Increasingly, Satanism is replacing Christianity as society’s moral reference point.

The goal of Cabalist (i.e. Illuminati) Jews has been to destroy Christian civilization and they are succeeding. No Jew living today should be blamed for the crucifixion of Christ. But, after the crucifixion until the present, the goal of Cabalist-controlled organized Jewry continued to be the eradication of Christianity. They defined Christian resistance to their own demise, as “anti Semitism,” inverting god and evil as Satanists do.

The Illuminati plan to create a world “superstate” dedicated to their wealth, power and perversions. With the help of non-Jewish Freemasons, they have taken over the West and are inducting humanity into their satanic cult. I have listed many ways humanity is satanically possessed.

2. As I have said, in a satanic cult, the rank and file is not told the true agenda. It is manipulated and degraded with specious arguments and platitudes (i.e. “tolerance”, “diversity,””sexual liberation.”) In a satanic cult, people are coerced. People of conscience are smeared as “self-haters.” Increasingly people have become Jews or “haters” if they haven’t. In a cult, the truth doesn’t matter. Only political correctness. Society is beginning to resemble a cult.

When I speak of reviving “anti Semitism,” I don’t mean discriminating against or persecuting individual Jews like myself. I mean opposing anyone — Jew or non Jew– who represents the Cabalist (Illuminati) agenda, now espoused by the whole economic, political and cultural establishment in the West, controlled by organized Judaism and Freemasonry. Desmond Tutu. Mikael Gorbachev, the Bilderberg attendees. Many are Jews. Most aren’t. But most are Cabalists, Satanists or sell-outs.

There are really only two sides in the New World Order: The Cabalists (Illuminati, their agents and constituency) versus the rest of humanity. (All the rest is obfuscation.) The Cabalists include Freemasons on both the Right and Left, liberals, socialists, radical feminists, Neocons, Communists, Zionists, homosexual activists- you get the picture. As you can tell, these movements are all Jew-created and Jew-creating.

3. I believe Jews would find it liberating to disassociate with Judaism. Many already have. Judaism is the source of anti Semitism. In addition, often it is personally dysfunctional. The agenda of organized Jewry, proven by its record-to-date, is to re-engineer the human race to serve the Illuminati. They do this by destroying the four legs of our human identity – religion (God); nationhood, race and family (gender). Their goal is one race, one religion, one gender and one world all in the service of the Illuminati. A recent example of their one-world-ism is organized Jewry’s opposition to nationalist movements in Europe.

THE FIRST ANTI SEMITE

Continues …At the SOURCE ( Click Here )

 

SCREW the Yanks & Poms… “Nationalise our oil & gas, raw materials!”


The following release was first issued on 22 July 2008. The CEC is reissuing it today, because Australia’s energy security is under assault from multinational oil companies and predatory speculators. The oil oligopoly is systemically shutting down Australia’s fuel refineries, to leave the nation at the mercy of imports. Predatory speculators in London and Amsterdam are keeping the price of oil artificially inflated. This reissued release explains that the only way Australia will preserve its energy security is by nationalising the oil and gas industries.

The speculation-driven skyrocketing price of petroleum is savaging all Australian citizens, and destroying our agricultural and trucking industries, among many others. This crisis is orchestrated, not only through the Amsterdam spot market, where hundreds of “paper barrels” of oil are bought and sold for every actual barrel produced, but also here at home, through the collusion of both Coalition and ALP governments with the British Imperial energy/raw materials cartel over the past two decades or more. Our continent and surrounding waters contain some of the world’s greatest deposits of oil and gas, literally oceans of it, while hundreds if not thousands of on-and offshore oil wells have been drilled and just capped, in order to create an artificial shortage.

Therefore, to protect the Common Good of this country, both in the present international hyper inflationary crisis, and to secure Australia’s future, the Citizens Electoral Council calls for the nationalisation of all our oil & gas deposits, together with our raw materials in general. We must establish an Australian National Resources Company (ANRC), to control, protect and develop our almost-unimaginable wealth in energy and raw materials, which is presently being looted by Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton, Shell, BP, etc.. The September 2008 issue of the Citizens Electoral Council’s New Citizen newspaper will contain our full proposal for the ANRC. Here, we merely highlight crucial aspects respecting the so-called “oil crisis”.

  1. Oil can be, and is now being produced in this country for $5 per barrel. Here it is from the horse’s mouth, in a briefing given by Mike Yeager, Chief Executive of BHP Billiton’s Petroleum Sector on 7 May 2008: “We’re right now sitting at $5 [production price per barrel] … That’s how we’re able to, to contribute these extraordinary returns and extraordinary margins to our corporation—something we’re very, very pleased with.”

    Allowing for refining and distribution costs etc., and retail margin, a $5 per barrel production cost would translate into an approximate petrol/diesel cost of 25 cents per litre, before tax. As for excise taxes, their purpose is nominally to fund road maintenance; in reality, they are not only poured into General Revenue (and not mainly used for road maintenance), but are highly regressive, and therefore should be scrapped. Road maintenance, like other major infrastructure, should be funded out of a Capital Budget, as distinct from the Government’s annual Operating Budget.
     

  2. While the Coalition/ALP governments provide hundreds of millions or billions in taxpayers funds to British or British-controlled companies to develop oil and gas fields, those governments demand almost nothing in return. Yeager: “In the deep-water Gulf of Mexico and in Western Australia, we pay very, very small royalties. We keep the majority of the barrels ourselves… So, we keep all the upside. If these barrels were in Algeria or some other place of the world, then you’d be sharing that upside with the Government.”

     

  3. Numerous experts, such as Marita Bradshaw, Senior Petroleum Adviser to Geoscience Australia, and Belinda Robinson, Chief Executive of the Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association (APPEA), have repeatedly stated that Australia’s natural gas deposits are so huge that Australia could soon be the second or third largest producer of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the world, “another Qatar”.

     

  4. Putting aside that oil is often found along with natural gas, the AusGeo News observed in March 2005, regarding petroleum, “The continent and its marine jurisdiction are vastly underexplored; only 8000 wells have been drilled and many offshore basins have never been tested.” Surveying the state of Australia’s oil industry, The Australian reported on 14 April 2007, “In terms of offshore frontier basins [i.e. prospective oil fields] Australia has the largest spread and largest variety of any country in the world. There is little doubt that Australia has barely scratched the surface in terms of petroleum exploration.”

     

  5. This crisis has been orchestrated, both by lack of government policy to develop oil and gas, and because hundreds or even thousands of oil wells which have been drilled, have been “cased and suspended”, as reported by dozens of individuals active in the industry and even partially by the government itself, as in Geoscience Australia’s 2006 report, “Oil and Gas Resources of Australia 2004”, among other sources.

Consider: In 1985, Australia produced 96% of all its crude oil needs through domestic production. Then, consider the following two reports, which document the devastating effects of this Australian government collusion with the British cartels in the ensuing years:

 

  • The U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported that Australia’s “net oil imports in 2000 averaged only 65,000 bbl/d, or 7 percent of total consumption”, then hit 39% of total consumption by 2006 (362,200 bbl/d of 925,000 bbl/d), but The Australian government expects petroleum import dependency to increase to around 80% in 2010. (emphasis added)

     

  • APPEA Chief Executive Belinda Robinson on 24 June 2008 reported that Australia actually had had a small net surplus of petroleum in 2000, but that went to “a deficit of about $13.7 billion in 2007”. Furthermore, she said, “Assuming no increase in refining capacity in Australia [which is entirely controlled by the oil cartel—ed.], that could blow out to $28 billion by 2017… (emphasis added)

As Australians, we must decide: Will we continue as a typical, ever more immiserated British colony looted for its raw materials resources, or shall we become, at long last, a sovereign nation state securing the Common Good for all of its citizens?

Citizens Electoral Council of Australia

Email: cec@cecaust.com.au

Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au
 

Google Bans Babylon


Bab·y·lon [noun] : In the Book of Revelation, the name of a whore who rules over the kings of the earth and rides upon a seven-headed beast. “Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and of the Abominations of the Earth.”—Revelations 17:5

Internet giant Yahoo! announced on November 10, 2013, that it won’t end its revenue sharing contract with Israeli Babylon, despite Google terminating its similar contract on November 30.

Google provided above 40% of Babylon’s revenues during the second quarter of 2013; Yahoo! provided over 30%, which amounts to almost $20 million.

Babylon CEO Alon Carmeli

Leaving Babylon CEO Alon Carmeli
Mystery Babylon – When Jerusalem Embraces The Antichrist

Google and Yahoo

Google and Yahoo face more urgent issues
The Yahoo! Style Guide

Babylon is the largest company in what is mockingly known as the Israeli Download Valley,* or in a more serious term the field of directing users. Israel has conquered several internet and information-technology niche markets. This is true to the extent that most American citizens are unwillingly sharing their secrets with the State of Israel.

I reviewed Babylon a few months ago in Microsoft Strikes Israeli Software after the American giant limited the activity of Babylon and similar companies on its browsers. Google decision was the result of pressure coming from users of its browser Chrome that correctly understood they were being robbed by Babylon.

“But, they are just nice kids translating stuff!”

On paper, Babylon looks like an inoffensive provider of online dictionaries. In the screenshot reproduced below, one can see the home page featured in many Bolivian internet kiosks. It is a Babylon search page, designed to look like a Google search page; note the odd code appearing in its address line (a long string of nonsense numbers and letters serving as directives to the company’s server, in contrast look at the address of this page), that’s the first sign something is wrong.

The second sign appears while using it; the computer reacts slowly since it is busy sending data to its Babylonian masters. This happens despite Bolivians being unable to spend money on the web; Bolivian money is not a free floating currency and thus it is banned by the international financial system. This search page is defined as a default in the user’s browser while installing Babylon’s dictionary.

Since the page looks like Google’s, few users realize that their home page has been replaced, or that they had clicked on a button asking for this change while installing the dictionary. “Same, same” they say to themselves and begin telling Babylon everything about themselves. The following week, they buy a book named “French Cooking;” a few days later—so that they won’t suspect the link between the events—they get a pamphlet advertising a French restaurant near their home. In thanks for the blunt violation of privacy, the Babylonian masters in Israel get a few silver coins.

Babylon Dictionary Screenshot

Babylon Dictionary Screenshot
Privacy Lost: How Technology Is Endangering Your Privacy

This is done through the customization of web-searches through the manipulation of one of five assets: home page, searches in the URL bar, searches in a third-party installed toolbar, a new page tab and the page landed on after typing in a wrong URL. These are monitored by Babylon and similar services.

Eventually, this leads to sales and these companies get commissions on them. Last year, Microsoft blocked this evil scheme, now Google follows.

Babylon Search Page

Babylon Search Page | Google Copycat | Note the Babylon Toolbar

Related: Microsoft Strikes Israeli Software

Did you know? Waze of Israel: Google Beats Facebook StarsAnimation

 

In Waze of Israel: Google Beats Facebook, I described a related company which had managed to create a surveillance and coordinating application. It is great for coordinating the move of several independent agents in a foreign country.

8200 Companies

Looking from outside, most Israeli companies mentioned in this article seem to be unrelated. Yet, it is not a secret that most key people in them are former Unit 8200 soldiers. Most of them openly boast about this. This SIGINT unit is the largest in the IDF and specializes in surveillance. It has formal relations with CAZAB. This is not random.

Unit 8200 Listening Post near Lebanon

Unit 8200 Listening Post near Lebanon
Surveillance Countermeasures: A Serious Guide To Detecting, Evading, And Eluding Threats To Personal Privacy

Engineers who had developed applications for 8200, often adapt them to the civilian environment. Over the years, this has created what is known as the Israeli Hi-Tech market described in this article. Often this is done with the blessing and help of their military unit. After all, these applications provide valuable data for those persecuting others. Where a person connects to the web, what he does, with whom he communicates. All provided willingly by the victim of the State.

Babylon’s Death?

Following Google discontinuation of the contract with Babylon, the latter has only one significant customer. Babylon claims that Yahoo! told it “Following actions implemented by the company to correct defects, Yahoo! does not intend to suspend or cancel the agreement between the two companies.” Yahoo! has not reacted publicly.

Babylon announced that it would be more cautious in how it acquired new users in the future, coordinating and maintaining full transparency in its relations with Yahoo!. In other words, the company indirectly acknowledged violating us.

Yet, CEO Alon Carmeli is leaving the company, after saying that he has “exhausted his role.” Today, November 11, Babylon appointed its CFO Shanit Pe’er Tsfoni as its new CEO. She had not said yet how she plans to solve the crisis.

Showing the situation’s seriousness, internet software distributor IronSource, an emerging force in Download Valley, put merger talks with Babylon on hold at the end of October, saying that it will await further developments regarding Babylon’s contract with Yahoo!. “We’re waiting to see what will happen with Yahoo!’s investigation and how the findings will affect its relations with Babylon,” IronSource CEO Tomer Bar Zeev said

Mr. Carmeli, Babylonian Master of Online Translation, how do you say “failure” in Hebrew?

———

What the Western Media Won’t Tell You: Crimean Tatars and Ukrainians Also Voted to Join Russia


16 марта мы выбираем

или

Image: “On the 16th of March We Choose”: neo-Nazi Ukraine “Or” Russia?

Media reports acknowledge that 83.1 percent of eligible Crimean voters cast their ballot in the March 16th referendum.

The final tally of the vote was 96.77 percent in favor of joining the Russian Federation, and 2.51 percent against.

File:Distribution of ethnic groups in Crimea 2001.png

The Western media has underscored that both the Crimean Tatars as well as the Ukrainian population of Crimea were against joining the Russian Federation. The Non-Russian population constitutes 41.7 percent of the Crimean population.

According to official data, Russians constitute 58.32% of the population of Crimea, 24.32% are Ukrainians and 12.10% are Crimean Tatars.

The Guardian, in a slither of media disinformation intimated that the Tatars feared a wave of repression if Crimea were to join the Russian Federation:

Now, as Crimea faces a referendum that is likely to seal its fate as a province or satellite of Russia, ethnic tensions are reaching boiling point. In a chilling echo of history, Tatar houses in the Crimean city of Bakhchisarai have been marked with an ominous X, just as they were before the Soviet-era deportations. On Monday two Tatar businesses were firebombed.

…. The prospect of a return to living under Moscow’s rule is disturbing. “People are in panic. “We are trying to keep people calm but they are scared of the Russian soldiers and Cossacks that come here,” he said.” (Crimea’s Tatars fear the worst as it prepares for referendum | World news | theguardian.com

Contrary to the reports of 135  international observers from 23 countries, the Western media in chorus has suggested without a shred of evidence that the elections were rigged and that Crimea was under Russian military occupation.

The observer mission reports which include members of theEuropean Parliament have been casually ignored by the mainstream Western media: 

Mateus Piskorkski, the leader of the European observers’ mission and Polish MP:  “Our observers have not registered any violations of voting rules.”

Ewald Stadler, member of the European Parliament, dispelled the “referendum at gunpoint” myth:  “I haven’t seen anything even resembling pressure… People themselves want to have their say.”

Pavel ChernevBulgarian member of parliament:  “Organization and procedures are 100 percent in line with the European standards,” he added.

A woman is reflected in a mirror as she casts her ballot during voting in a referendum at a polling station in Simferopol March 16, 2014.(Reuters / Thomas Peter)

A woman is reflected in a mirror as she casts her ballot during voting in a referendum at a polling station in Simferopol March 16, 2014.(Reuters / Thomas Peter)

Johann Gudenus, member of the Vienna Municipal Council:  “Our opinion is – if people want to decide their future, they should have the right to do that and the international community should respect that. There is a goal of people in Crimea to vote about their own future. Of course, Kiev is not happy about that, but still they have to accept and to respect the vote of people in Crimea”.

People line up to receive their ballots during the referendum on the status of Ukraine's Crimea region at a polling station in Simferopol March 16, 2014. (Reuters / Vasily Fedosenko)

Serbian observer Milenko Baborats “People freely expressed their will in the most democratic way, wherever we were… During the day we didn’t see a single serious violation of legitimacy of the process,”

Srdja Trifkovic, prominent and observer from Serbia: “The presence of troops on the streets is virtually non-existent and the only thing resembling any such thing is the unarmed middle-aged Cossacks who are positioned outside the parliament building in Simferopol. But if you look at the people both at the voting stations and in the streets, like on Yalta’s sea front yesterday afternoon, frankly I think you would feel more tense in south Chicago or in New York’s Harlem than anywhere round here,” he said.   (For more details see Crimean ‘Referendum at Gunpoint’ is a Myth – International Observers By Global Research News, March 17, 2014)

Yet according to Time Magazine, without acknowledging the reports of the international observers,the ballot had to have been rigged and the vote was held under the gun of the Russian military:

“95 percent voted in favor of becoming a part of Russia. That may seem like an impossible result, the mark of a rigged election. And in some ways it was. The vote was held during a Russian military occupation of Crimea and the ballot did not offer voters the option of keeping their current status in Ukraine. ( Time, March 17, 2014)

In chorus, Western media reports have stated that both Ukrainians and Tatars were firmly against seceding from Ukraine. They also intimated that the Tatar community had decided not to vote.

According to the Washington Post, “a vote in favor of seceding” was inevitable because “ethnic Russians make up 60 percent of Crimea’s population”. But the result was not 60 percent in favor, it was 97 percent in favor, indicating that all major ethnic groups in the Crimea voted in favor of seceding from Ukraine.

crimeeThe figures do not add up:  The Russians constitute 58 percent of Crimea’s population, yet 97 percent of the vote was in favor of joining Russia. If Ukrainians and Tatars had refused to participate in the referendum, voter participation would have been substantially less that 83.1.

The referendum was also a vote against the US-EU sponsored Coup d’etat.

The results confirm that the Tatars and Ukrainians who did cast their ballot, also voted overwhelmingly in favor of joining Russia.

What this 97 percent vote also indicates is a rejection of the illegal Neo-Nazi government in Kiev.  The Election poster (image above) reads:

16 марта мы выбираем или

“On the 16 of March we choose”: neo-Nazi Ukraine “Or” the Russian Federation?

Articles by:Prof Michel Chossudovsky 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/what-the-western-media-wont-tell-you-crimean-tatars-and-ukrainians-also-voted-to-join-russia/5373989

Illuminati Jews Responsible for Holocaust


March 3, 2014

antleman.jpg(left, Antleman’s book, Vols. One & Two) 

THE REAL WAR AGAINST THE JEWS AND HUMANITY BY ILLUMINATI JEWS: 


Barry Chamish honors his mentor Rabbi Marvin Antleman who died in January.
Antleman was first to identify the Illuminati with the Sabbatean-Frankist cult which
took over Judaism and the world beginning in the 17th century. Later they initiated 
World War Two and the holocaust in order to establish their satanic world headquarters in Israel. 

————————————————————-

Barry-Chamish.JPG
Originally from Winnipeg, Barry Chamish is a veteran journalist driven out of Israel for his exposure of the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin by the Shin Bet. His web site is barrychamish.com

by Barry Chamish 
(edited by henrymakow.com)

http://henrymakow.com/2014/03/Illuminati-Jews-Responsible-for-Holocaust.html

 

In 1932, how many organizations in Germany represented German Jewry? Over 250. In 1933, after the Nazi takeover? One, and one only; Labour Zionism. We will return to the significance shortly…
       
In the 2000 years of European Jewish history there were pogroms, crusades and inquisitions, the latter aided and abetted by the Jesuits. But compared to what happened from the 1880s on, life was a tolerable picnic. The turning point in the final war against the Jews was the founding of Zionism by the Sabbateans. The final aim of the movement was to establish a Sabbatean state in the historical land of the Jews, thus taking over Judaism for good.

To foment the idea, life had to made so intolerable for Europe’s Jews that escape to Palestine would appear to be the best option. The Cossack pogroms were the first shot in this campaign and for them, the Frankists turned to the Jesuits and their influence over the Catholic Church. The Jesuits had done more to spread communism, beginning with their feudal communes in South America, and now they wanted to punish the anti-papists of Europe by imprisoning them behind communal bars. The deal was simple: The Jesuits provided the Cossacks, the Frankists provided the communists. And naturally, the Rothschilds would provide the moolah.

Once the situation turned foreboding, the German-writing intellectuals took over…. Vienna writer, Theodore Herzl could rally the masses as neither of them could and he was chosen to be the spokesman and symbol of the movement.

HERZL SUICIDED 

 In 1901, Herzl appeared in Britain where he was not well received. We are told he backed another option, creating a Jewish sanctuary in British – controlled East Africa. If the idea caught on, it would neutralize the Sabbateans’ game plan. Herzl died not long after and not one biography of him tells us how. He entered a Paris sanatorium for a not known condition and never emerged. 

This was highly fortunate for the British Freemasons doing the Sabbateans’ bidding, for they replaced Herzl with one of their own, a German-educated Jew named Chaim Weizmann. In time, a cockamamie legend was fabricated involving the Balfour declaration creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine as a reward for Weizmann finding a way to make acetone for explosives from dried up paint. Not one explosion in World War One came from this magic process. But the British took great pains to capture Palestine from the Turks and appoint the leaders of the upcoming Sabbatean state.

Meeting in London during the War, Weizmann and Balfour had to deal with the problem of the people already living in Palestine, most of whom were religious Jews, who were the majority in such major centers as Jerusalem, Sfat and Tiberius. The myth of an ancient Palestinian Arab indigenous population is belied by any number of reports by visitors as talented as Twain and Balzac, who accurately noted the paucity of Arabs in the land during the 19th century. The later economic success of the new enterprise drew hundreds of thousands of Arabs from as far away as Iraq to the region with consequences the Illuminati were possibly well aware of.  [Makow- I depart from Chamish here. In 1880, there were  24,000 Jews living among 450,000    Palestinians or about 5.3%]…

 Rabbi Antelman proves that the American President Woodrow Wilson was thoroughly corrupted by the Frankists through their agent Colonel House. It was Wilson who put an end to America’s open immigration policy. Until then, despite all their despair, most Eastern European Jews rejected Palestine as an escape route, the majority choosing America as their destination. From now on very few would enjoy that option. It would have to be Palestine or nowhere. 

NAZI GERMANY

We now jump to 1933. Less than 1% of the German Jews support Zionism. Many tried to escape from Naziism by boat to Latin and North American ports but the international diplomatic order was to turn them back. Any German Jew who rejected Palestine as his shelter would be shipped back to his death.

By 1934, the majority of German Jews got the message and turned to the only Jewish organization allowed by the Nazis, the Labour Zionists. For confirmation of the conspiracy between them and Hitler’s thugs read The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black, Perfidy by Ben Hecht or The Scared And The Doomed by Jacob Nurenberger. The deal cut worked like this. The German Jews would first be indoctrinated into Bolshevism in Labour Zionism camps and then, with British approval, transferred to Palestine. Most were there by the time the British issued the White Paper banning further Jewish immigration. The Labour Zionists got the Jews they wanted, and let the millions of religious Jews and other non-Frankists perish in Europe without any struggle for their survival.

But not all Jews fell for the plan. A noble alternative Zionism arose led by Zeev Jabotinsky. He led the Jews in demanding free passage to Palestine and a worldwide economic boycott of the Nazi regime. The Labour Zionists did all in their power to short-circuit the opposition. First, they forced all the German Jews in Palestine to use their assets to buy only goods from Nazi Germany. This kept the regime afloat. Then Chaim Weizmann and his Jewish Agency employed their appointed agents in the US to neutralize Jabotinsky and his followers using any means at their disposal. This culminated in Jabotinsky’s suspicious death in New York in 1941. Later, Jabotinsky’s most literate advocate, Ben Hecht, was run over by a truck on a Manhattan sidewalk. His crime was being the first to widely expose the Jewish Agency-Nazi plot.

Into this plot against the Jews we add the Jesuits, who wished with all their hearts, to wreck the land that produced Luther, but the Vatican’s role in the Holocaust is not the focus of this overview. We now return to America where the Jewish leadership used all their contacts and resources to make good and certain that the unwanted non-Sabbatean Jews of Europe never again saw the light of day.

———————-

See Chamish YouTube on this subject

Related –     Ex-Pres of Canadian Jewish Congress Implies Illuminati Jews Behind the Holocaust
—————      Sabbateans, Red Kabbalah and the Rothschilds    (video)

Chamish’s book Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism And The Holocaust, is available at  http://www.lulu.com/content/336970
 
Chamish writes: That book and therefore that lecture would not have been completed without my good friend Rabbi Marvin Antelman, who died earlier this year. His time had come but we had spoken at least once a week for over twenty years. He was my soul mate and my mentor. I’m still alive and the best I can do for you Marvin by way of epitaph, is reprint the admiration I felt for you when we were both younger and in my case, while you guided me, more hopeful.

First Comment from David Livingstone :

Glad you posted this Henry,

I just happened to listen over the weekend to an interview he did with Elat Pressman. I was totally blown away. He says exactly what I say in my new book, but in some cases with more detail:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqg5lGB9FXY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00IPlqQFnHo

I’ve contacted him, and we are supposed to get in touch over the next few days.

“THICK AS A BRICK”


       AussieWatch

Issue:February 7th 2014

“THICK AS A BRICK”

Amazing, but true, if you think about it, and it shows the importance of accuracy in your tax return.

The CRA has returned the Tax Return to a man in Canada after he apparently answered one of the questions incorrectly.

In response to the question, …

Do you have anyone dependent on you ?

The man wrote: …  “2.1 million illegal immigrants, 1.1 million crackheads, 4.4 million unemployable scroungers, 80,000 criminals in over 85 prisons plus 650 idiots in Parliament and the entire group that call themselves Politicians”.

The CRA stated that the response he gave was unacceptable.

The man’s response back to the CRA was, …

Who did I leave out ?
*******************************************************************************

DID YOU KNOW ???

“Australian pensioner vote holds the power of government” 

Why don’t they use it ???

*******************************************************************************

SCHAPELLE CORBY’S SENDS FEAR THROUGH GOVERNMENT … WHY?

Picture compliments of Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images

Wikileaks Julian Assange, whistleblower Edward Snowden have turned over to the public USA spy network violations they have conducted behind closed doors. Why is Schapelle Corby terrifying Australian government when her name is mentioned?

Today our Prime Minister Abbot had this to say in The Australian;

TONY Abbott has issued a veiled caution to convicted drug smuggler Schapelle Corby not to profit by selling the story of her nine years in jail. 

Corby could learn as early as tomorrow whether her bid for parole has been successful, opening the way for her release from Bali‘s Kerobokan prison.

If it’s approved, Corby, 36, will serve her parole in the Kuta home of her sister Mercedes and her husband Wayan Widyartha.
There is speculation Corby could be paid millions of dollars for her first tell-all interview.

But the Prime Minister suggested he does not think that should happen.

“The old principle is crime should not pay,” Mr Abbott told Fairfax Radio.

“But I don’t want to say anything on this.

“I wouldn’t want to prejudice the outcomes of any discussions that are going on about her tenure.”

He said Corby‘s case was a high-profile consular case and the “less public comment by politicians, the better”.

One could understand you thinking a Monty Python script but it is your fearless leader out there loading the dice against Corby on the day before decision of parole is to be considered.  “Less public comment by politicians, the better” should have been the only answer to the question.

Corby’s massive support base unearthed evidence those in power did not want recovered. A compliant media network committed to release a Corby telemovie was funded by whom? This production will be sharply discredited from Corby faithful bloodhound evidence warehouse.

Hollywood producer’s, interested in a box office smash?  “The CorbyChronicles” based on facts, cameo appearances by Schapelle Corby (herself), bullshit by government bodies, then the finale of  Facts.

We await today’s Indonesian court decision before selecting the cards we lead from the warehouse to the court of public opinion.

Letter to Mr Abbott:

Mr Abbott,

I have just read your words regarding Schapelle Corby: the words which The Australian Newspaper has interpreted and reported as a “veiled threat” to her. I wonder, does she REALLY need any sort of threat, at this point in time?
 
I am talking about the interview in which you were stoking up the rabble and feeding the spiteful: those who maliciously want to deny her any form of revenue, who want her to be on public display, suffering in poverty, punished repeatedly for life. The vicious Australian underclass, which is so large it doesn’t bear thinking about.
 
If she escapes from a decade of trauma, do you really grudge her some revenue on which to survive, to obtain the necessary means for expensive medications, for privacy, to try to recover and heal some scars?
 
Go ahead then, because let’s face it, Canberra cannot possibly make Australia look any more barbaric than it already has.
 
In the case of the seizure of revenue, a good case in point is described in the attached report. It documents the open and ILLEGAL theft of her book royalties, which even unlawfully extended Australian law outside its borders. Oh, and lest we forget, it did this WHILST SHE WAS STILL IN LEGAL PROCESS IN INDONESIA.
 
Yes, it actually flagged Jakarta, loud and clear, with the message that Canberra considered her to be guilty. How courageous Australia is.
 
Was this particular act of grotesque political abuse undertaken to hide the criminal acts which had been previously perpetrated against her by government ministers, Mr Abbott? You know the ones: those documented in the UN report (Download HERE) submitted by people in 51 nations. Those which shame and damn the nation.
 
Do you want me to list them? Do you want me to explain, again, what Australian politicians have done to this woman? The trauma, the torment, the torture, the betrayal she has felt burning inside. The degradation she has suffered, the abuses she has endured in her cell, the mental disintegration as her pleas for help to her own nation were ignored?
 
Not ignored: she was ridiculed, slandered, maligned, denigrated and laughed at. She was smeared and fabricated against, endlessly.
 
And what do you now do? You feed that same campaign.
 
Well done, Mr Abbott. True leadership.



Simon Langford

RUMBLINGS Of An Old Fart for today 03/02/2014….Top 10: Things You Should Never Tell A Woman


The Psychology Of Needy Women

You’re past the early stages of your relationship and the two of you are getting pretty close. You are probably thinking that it’s time to open up and share all those intimate details of your past and present. Well, stop right there.

Up until now, you’ve probably been told that honesty is the best policy in a relationship — and most of the time it is. However, there are certain things about you, your family and your personal history that you don’t need to share with your woman — ever.

Now, I’m certainly not advocating lying, but rather selectively omitting some information that might not work in your favor. The following are 10 things that you should definitely not tell your girlfriend, even if she asks. In fact, mentioning any of the following would probably have her say, “I wish you hadn’t told me that.

Number 10

Your family hates her.
This is an unfortunate situation, yes. But if you tell her, you’ll only fuel the fire by making her angry or insecure. If you don’t agree with your family’s hesitations about her, then politely ask them to butt out. Just do what you can to make them change their minds and hope they’ll warm up to her with time.

Number 9

You have insecurities.
Do you feel jealous of your best friend’s looks or his sweet new car? Or do you envy your girlfriend’s status, job or salary? Everyone has their share of insecurities, but in the dating world, it’s vital that you keep these insecurities under your hat. One of the most important things a woman looks in a man is confidence, and if she sees that you are constantly insecure and jealous, you won’t seem so poised. So if you can’t put a stop to your insecurities and your green-eyed monster, at least try to keep it to yourself.

Number 8

You flirt with other women.
If you are a flirty type of guy, she probably knows it already. In fact, you probably flirted with her before you got together. Having said that, she doesn’t need to hear the list of women that you flirted with all day, nor does she need to hear about the list of women that flirted with you. If it really is harmless flirting, then why make her worry about it?

If you’re afraid of spiders or think your ex was way better than her in bed, for God’s sake, keep it to yourself…

Number 7

You have wimpy behavior.
Okay, so you don’t kill spiders, you run away from fights and maybe you even cry during movies. Unfortunately for you, the clich is true: Women like strong men. So telling her that you’re afraid of an itty-bitty insect or that you can’t stand heights isn’t going to work in your favor. Naturally, if you are going to be with her in the long term, she might learn some of these little factoids as you go along. But do your best not to divulge them all in the beginning.

Number 6

You compare her to your ex-girlfriend in bed.
Needless to say, everyone does this; she is probably also comparing you to her ex to some extent. But do avoid offering her specific details about your past conquests, specifically the fact that your past lover was better than her in bed. In fact, even if you are telling her that she is better than your ex, this is a bad can of worms to open. No woman wants to be compared to another, especially in the sexual department.

Number 5

You talk to your mother too often.
Do you talk to mom several times a day? To a woman you’re dating, that could be a little intimidating. A woman doesn’t want to feel like she’s competing with your mother, or worse, that you’re dependent on mommy. So just keep that cute little secret to yourself.

Number 4

You have not-so-cool hobbies.
So you might keep a collection of Transformers in your underwear drawer or be fascinated by things like Faberge eggs. But you have to realize that it is unlikely that she will appreciate your wacky interests and hobbies. Don’t fool yourself into thinking that such quirks

Number 3

You don’t like her girlfriends.
What’s the only thing worse than having the hots for her girlfriends? You guessed it: talking badly about her girlfriends in front of her. Or even divulging that you think her friends are anything but sweet and fabulous people. Most of her girlfriends have been in her life longer than you have, so talking negatively about them probably won’t work out too well for you. If she doesn’t end things with you entirely, she’s sure to at least become defensive and angry about this — so if you absolutely need to trash her girlfriends, just make sure she’s not within earshot.

Number 2

You’ve done shameful things in the past.
You might think that the two of you are close enough for you to reveal these little tidbits. But unfortunately, she’ll never be ready to hear that you’ve cheated on past girlfriends or that you’ve enjoyed private dances at strip clubs. Even non-sexual shameful acts that you’ve committed — like theft, bullying or betrayals — are not things that you want to divulge. While you might want to get some of these secrets off your chest, she will never forget them. And you’ll come off looking like a less moral or honest person as a result.

Number 1

You find one of her friends smoking hot.
So you think that blonde friend of hers is cute? Fair enough. But do have the sense not to mention it to your girlfriend — not even as a joke. She won’t find it funny; actually, she will probably be angry and hurt, and in the long run, she’ll never trust you around her friends. You might think that your girlfriend is secure enough to handle this piece of information, but let me tell you that she’s not. Most girls aren’t, so don’t risk it.

Don’t say more than you have to

Do be open and honest with her about most things — by now, she should know most of the details of your personal life. Facts about your health and personal life that affect her are important to divulge. But consider this: Her opinion of you isn’t completely formed yet.

So when it comes to these 10 seemingly unimportant tidbits, be selective about what you tell her. Just as you are living the good life not knowing all those little secrets she’s been keeping from you, she’ll be happier not knowing the about ghosts in your closet.

Good Luck prince charming…L.M.B.O.

Top 10 Anti-Semitic Slurs of 2013, edited by Pandora Pushkin


By Dr Lasha Darkmoon on January 1, 2014

Darkmoon — Dec 31, 2013

Sourced from The Jerusalem Post and presented with pictures, captions and comments by Pandora Pushkin

Why are people still saying such bad things about the Jews? Isn’t it time to grow up and be nice and friendly? Let’s hope 2014 will be an improvement on 2013!

 

IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI:
Voted in by the Simon Wiesenthal Center as No.1 Anti-Semite of 2013.
“Israel is a rabid dog in the region,” he raged.
“Its leaders look like beasts and cannot be called human!”

(If you are deeply shocked by this deeply shocking comment, please read no further)

The Simon Wiesenthal Center announced on Monday its 2013 top-10 list of anti-Semitic and anti-Israel slurs, giving the top two slots to the leaders of Iran and Turkey.

The list underlined the failure of the international community to confront contemporary anti-Semitism by citing state-sponsored drives to attack Jews and Israel and the role of a UN official, authors, academic and church groups and celebrities in stoking Jew-hatred.

The center, an international human rights organization best known for combating modern anti-Semitism and bringing World War II Nazis to justice, topped the list with Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei’s “genocidal threats against the Jewish state.”

In November, Khamenei described Israel as the “rabid dog in the region,” adding, “Its leaders look like beasts and cannot be called human.” Khamenei said shortly before the Iranian election that “Zionists” were the real agents in control of the United States – an accusation with which he was “updating the old canard of a global Jewish conspiracy,” according to the center.

PANDORA PUSHKIN comments: It was very wrong of Mr Khamenei to say this. This horrid Persian should shut up, and study his history a bit more, before he opens his big bearded mouth!  The idea that Jews control America is just absurd. Everyone knows that AIPAC has no influence on Congress whatever! As for a “Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world”, golly gosh! I never heard such poppycock since reading The Protocols of the Elders of Zion!

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Anti-Semite No. 2 of 2013… not clear what he said to offend the Jews… but he looks a real mean critter, doesn’t he? Click to enlarge

Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan garnered thesecond spot on the list for blaming the actions of the June anti-government Turkish demonstrators, who sought greater democracy, on the “interest rate lobby,” which Erdogan’s deputy said was “The Jewish Diaspora.” The Wiesenthal center said Erdogan had suggested that Israel engineered the ouster of Egypt’s Islamic president Mohamed Morsi.

Speaking to The Jerusalem Post on Sunday from Herzliya via telephone, Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said the aim of this year’s list was “to get across the point” that people who have credentials or are prime minister or the Supreme Leader should not receive free passes because of their positions of power.

“The rest of the world should not be so friendly with them. It is not correct to have meetings with the prime minister of Turkey when he is a common bigot,” Hier said.

Pandora Pushkin comments: Quite right too! Wasn’t it this same anti-Semitic Turkish Prime Minister, Erdogan, who had the gall to protest at the “murder” of nine Turkish citizens aboard the ship Mavi Marmara in the Mediterranean Sea in May 2010? This was when Brave Little Israel decided to attack the pirate vessel, cunningly disguised as part of a “humanitarian flotilla”, as it chugged toward terrorist-ridden Gaza, armed to the teeth with deadly kitchen knives and teaspoons.

Hier criticized the Geneva photograph of euphoric foreign ministers celebrating the Iran nuclear deal in November as a dismissal of Khamenei’s threats against Israel. “The jubilant mood” took place, he said, days after Iran’s leader called for “the elimination of the state of Israel, making it clear that Iran’s singular foreign policy is the elimination of Israel.”

Also notable on this year’s list was the presence of two anti-Israel Jewish Americans whose language contributes to anti-Semitism, according to Hier. Richard Falk, UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian Territories, occupied the third spot and the journalist Max Blumenthal scored ninth place.

 

Richard Falk, UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian Territories, is No. 3 Anti-Semite of 2013. His offense? His bizarre belief that the Palestinians could also have “human rights”.

Rabbi Hier told the Post that he considers Falk and Blumenthal to “absolutely” fall in the category of Jewish anti-Semites.

“It is not the first time in the history of the Jewish people” that Jews have made anti-Jewish rants, Hier said. He stressed that one has to “judge people by their words. You can be an anti-Semite if you talk like anti-Semites.”

Hier continued, “Richard Falk should not be given a free pass because he is Jewish. We think he, Richard Falk, is an outright anti-Semite.” Likewise, Hier said of Blumental, “we judge him by what he wrote. He crossed the line into outright anti-Semitism.”

According to the Wiesenthal list, Blumenthal uses chapter titles in his book Goliath to equate Israel with the Nazi regime. Chapters in his book are entitled “Summer Camp of Destruction,” “Date with the Devil,” “There Is No Dream,” “The Concentration Camp,” “The Night of Broken Glass” and “How to Kill Goyim and Influence People.” The center noted that “he quotes approvingly characterizations of Israelis soldiers as ‘Judeo-Nazis.’”

Pandora Pushkin comments: Tsk, tsk! this comparison of Israelis with “Nazis” is most inappropriate! The Nazis were good-looking guys by all accounts — “blonde beasts”, handsome hunks of humanity who are reported to have swept ton loads of  French women off their feet in Occupied France during World War II. Sorry, I just can’t see the Israelis doing that!

Dr. Eric Alterman, a prominent professor of English in New York City, wrote that Blumenthal’s “book could have been a selection of a hypothetical Hamas Book of the Month Club.” Alterman penned his critical review of Blumenthal’s book in the left-wing magazine The Nation, where he is a columnist.

Speaking from Washington with the Post, Josh Block, a former Clinton administration spokesman who is CEO of The Israel Project, said of Blumenthal: “I am sure his colleagues at the Hezbollah newspaper where he was a writer for years are pleased and not at all surprised to see their guy on this list… Turns out the anti-Semites of Al-Akhbar and Iran’s Press TV discovered this modern- day Jewish Father Coughlin before anyone else.”

The Wiesenthal Center said Falk had argued that Israel might be organizing a Nazi-like Holocaust, and had defended Palestinian terrorism as “the right of resistance” because suicide attacks would inflict significant pressure on Israel.

Pandora Pushkin comments: The idea that Israel might be organizing a “Nazi-like Holocaust” of the Palestinians is of course manifestly absurd when we consider Israel’s exemplary behaviour during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza (Dec 2008-Jan 2009). During this trying period, Israel  killed a mere 1400 evil Palestinian terrorists, mostly women and children, using the kindest of weapons available to it, including skin-melting white phosphorus bombs. Don’t forget, too, that Israel was to lose as many as 11 heroic martyrs during this humanitarian exercise.

European cartoonists from Norway, Germany and France landed the seventh slot for their depictions of Israel and Jews. In Germany in particular, the center cited “cartoons in two different newspapers (the Badische Zeitung and the Stuttgarter Zeitung) depicting Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu poisoning peace talks.”

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Wiesenthal Center, told the Post, “It is especially galling and outrageous in the midst of all this that two German newspapers would publish cartoons that – consciously or otherwise – deploy deep-rooted European anti-Semitic imagery of the Jew as poisoner. Those images do the poisoning and also validate [a] toxic attitude towards Israel and the Jewish people.”

Henryk M. Broder, a leading German author and an expert on new forms of anti-Semitism, praised the list for classifying the Badische Zeitung cartoon as anti-Semitic. He told the Post that “it hit the nail on the head.”

The German-Israel friendship society in Freiburg, where the Badische Zeitung is published, wrote in a statement to the Post, “In view of this ranking, we would appreciate if the editorial team of the Badische Zeitung could reconsider their statement about the cartoon. We hope that in the future the Badische Zeitung will exercise more care when it comes to the release of anti-Semitic depictions. In this context, we would like to mention that anti-Semitism can also be disguised as anti-Zionism.”

 

Should anti-Semitic cartoons like this be permitted? We call for an IMMEDIATE ban on all such cartoons!

Fourth on the list were political and church groups, along with Pink Floyd’s co-founder, Roger Waters. The center said that Waters slandered “Israel as an apartheid state, compares it to Nazi Germany and denies that the Iranian regime poses any threat to the Jewish State.”

The American Studies Association was cited for singling out Israel for a boycott. A right-wing extremist Hungarian political party called for a registry for Jews for “security reasons.”

The United Church of Canada was listed because “As Christians suffer in Syria, [are subject to] ethnic cleansing in Iraq and threatened in Egypt, The United Church of Canada endorsed the boycott of Israel – the only Middle East state that guarantees full religious freedom and protection to all faiths.”

The Pine Bush New York school district occupied the eighth spot for failing to protect Jewish pupils from “anti-Semitic slurs and physical abuse by bullies.”

The glorification of Hitler in Muslim-majority countries and elsewhere was listed sixth.

Pulitzer prize-winning novelist Alice Walker was co-listed as ninth for her latest book, Pin in the Cushion, which “is a diatribe against the Jewish state. Walker depicts Hamas-ruled Gaza as a benign place” and compares Israelis to the Nazis.

European anti-Semitism and racism in sports stadiums captured the tenth spot on the list.

The list included a call on NBA star Tony Parker to apologize for a Nazi-like salute.

Pandora Pushkin concludes: 2013 has been a bumper year for anti-Semitic comments. Like my old granny used to say, “Under every rock their lurks a nasty anti-Semitic insect!” Let’s hope 2014 will see a radical improvement in anti-Semitic attitudes.

This will depend to a large extent, of course, on Israel continuing to behave with its exemplary restraint in the Middle East. Israel must really try harder to steal less Palestinian land next year and kill a few less Palestinians. That would obviously help.

And Jews on the whole could also do a bit more to make themselves more popular: like, for example, by not spitting in Christians’ faces, as they do in the Holy Land on a regular basis — and by generally learning to make themselves more cuddly and lovable.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Source:….Click Here

Akka’s Old Fart 2013 in review


The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2013 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A New York City subway train holds 1,200 people. This blog was viewed about 3,900 times in 2013. If it were a NYC subway train, it would take about 3 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.