Robert Fisk – The Independent Oct 29, 2012
After last week’s Obama-Romney love-fest for Israel, the Arabs have been slowly deciding which of the two men would be best for the Middle East. It looks like Barack Obama is their man; but the problem – as always – is the sad, pathetic and outrageously obvious fact that it doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference.
George Bush invaded Iraq after giving Ariel Sharon permission to go on colonising the occupied West Bank. Obama got out of Iraq, increased drone strikes on the Pakistan-Afghan border and then behaved like a dog when Benjamin Netanyahu told him there would be no discussion about Israeli withdrawal to 1967 borders. Instead of saying, “Oh yes there will”, like a strong and independent president, Obama sat cowed in his White House seat as the Israeli prime minister effectively told him that UN Security Council resolution 242 – the very basis of the non-existent “peace process” – was a non-starter.
Since then, of course, Mitt Romney, who seems to have as much understanding of the Middle East as the Texas preacher who burned a Koran, has said the Palestinians “have no interest whatsoever in establishing peace” and has still not satisfactorily explained why, back in 2005 as governor of Massachusetts, he appeared rather keen on wire-tapping mosques. So good luck to the Arabs.
The truth, however, is that the next president is not going to have the freedom to decide his policy on the Middle East. The old love affair with Israel will continue – unless Israel attacks Iran and drags America into another Middle East war – but for the first time in American history, a successful presidential candidate is going to have to deal with a new Arab world; indeed, a new Muslim world.
The critical point is that the Arab Awakening (please let’s forget the “Spring” bit) represents a people calling for dignity. It includes non-Arab Muslims as well – what else was the mini-green revolution after the last Iranian elections? – and it means that the millions who live in the part of the world we still like to call the Middle East – it doesn’t feel very “middle” when you live there – now intend to make their own decisions, based on their wishes, not on those of their former satrap presidents and – in turn – their masters in Washington. La Clinton still seems not to have grasped this. Maybe Obama does. Romney? I bet he couldn’t draw a map of the nations in the area, except for one, of course.
Contrary to the Western belief that the Arabs are all struggling for “democracy”, the battle and the tragedy of the Middle East today – whether in the aftermath of the “soft” revolution in Tunisia or the butchery of Syria – is about that word dignity, about the right as a human being to say what you like about whomever you want and not to let a despot take personal ownership of a whole country (as long as he has the permission of the United States) and treat it as his private property.
Yes, revolutions are messy. The Egyptian revolution didn’t go quite the way we thought it would. Libya can easily break apart. Syria is a cataclysm. But the Arab people are speaking out at last and they will now ensure that their presidents and prime ministers abide by their wishes, not by the word of Washington or Moscow. Contrary to the Romney-style belief that there is a lack of civilisational values among the Arabs – viz his extraordinary remarks on Israel’s civilisation – the people of the Middle East are demonstrating quite the opposite. It is a slow business: every reader of this article will be dead of old age before the Arab “revolution” is complete.
But the days when US presidents instruct the potentates of the Middle East what to say and do are coming to an end. It will be a long time before the Saudi regime crumbles, along with all the other gas stations in the Gulf. And I suppose it must be said that the tragedy of the Palestinians probably lies at the heart of the Arab Awakening.
Alas, the Palestinians are the only ones not to benefit from the Arab revolutions. There is not enough land left for them to have a state. This is a fact beyond peradventure (as Enoch Powell used to say). Anyone doubting these words should book a flight to Israel and take a look at the West Bank. There is no place left for Palestine; this is the real tragedy that US presidents must face in the coming years.
Ali Gharib – The Daily Beast Oct 26, 2012
Thebig New York Times story over the weekend said that Israeli officials told the Times that they knew and approved of nascent bilateral talks between Iran and U.S. But then something happened: the Israelis changed course, and Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren told the paper, “We do not think Iran should be rewarded with direct talks.” Today, the Times carried a meta-story noting how that reversal had blossomed into a direct order from Netanyahu to the entire Israeli government – even in person to his cabinet ministers, and by cable to every diplomatic installation – to not discuss possible bilateral talks between Israel and Iran. The paper even laid out a timeline of the above flap with Oren:
Around 8 p.m. Israeli time on Saturday, a senior Israeli official, demanding anonymity, told a Times reporter that the Israelis were aware of the effort toward bilateral talks and were open to it, so long as Washington’s demands were clear: Tehran must stop enriching uranium, export its enriched-uranium stockpile and forfeit any effort to weaponize the material. Iran insists that its program is only for civilian use.
Two hours later, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael B. Oren, called the reporter with an official response he said was authorized by a high-ranking person in Jerusalem. The White House had not informed Israel of the agreement with Tehran, he said, and “we do not think Iran should be rewarded with direct talks.”
The Times also reported that before Netanyahu’s cable and statement, “Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon, who is the head of strategic affairs and is well briefed on Iran, encouraged ‘any negotiation that will lead to the end of the nuclear program.’” A former Israeli official, retired IDF intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin, wrote that any talks with Iran would be a “positive development.”
Two thoughts on this, both of which I’ve hinted at before. First, Israel clearly does not want there to be fruitful talks with Iran. Second, this still strengthens the case to me that, despite denials from the White House (and President Obama himself during the debate) and Iran, these nascent talks might actually be real. Given Israeli opposition to the talks, their making sure everyone stays shut up about it could just be that, as an Israeli told the Times, “most people who react don’t know anything and just speak as if they know.” Or it could be that Netanyahu wants to control the message and keep officials like Yaalon from going off the reservation because these talks are very, very real.
Dr Robert Faurisson – Darkmoon Oct 20, 2012
A slightly edited version of this article, with pictures, captions and additional commenary by Lasha Darkmoon
“If everyone who claims to be a Holocaust survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill?” — Norman Finkelstein’s mother, quoted in Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering.
The energy crisis is causing worry. However, Iran, which possesses huge reserves of oil and gas, wishes to exploit them better, with our help, and sell us the products, a procedure that would lead to a marked softening of worldwide petrol, diesel, fuel oil and gas prices. A good many nations have an eye on this great potential wealth and would be apt to respond favorably to Tehran’s business proposals. But the United States has decreed the boycott of Iran and, up to now, the world’s policeman has generally been obeyed.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can make all the proposals he likes: he still finds himself considered a criminal. His request for a collaboration that would let him fully re-equip the country’s drilling, production and processing operations is refused. He goes so far as to suggest that countries using the single European currency pay in euros and no longer in dollars, but to no avail. People turn their back to him. Some threaten him. Even the Pope refuses to receive him.
In many countries, President Ahmadinejad’s embassies and diplomatic staff are deprived of contact with the local authorities and foreign delegations; they have ended up with pariah status.
One may well ask oneself where such radical behavior towards the Iranians ever originated and why the international community acts so obviously against its own economic interests.
Three grounds are usually brought up to explain this policy of boycott and open hostility toward Iran:
1) The Iranian president is perhaps trying to arm his country with nuclear weapons.
2) It seems he wants to exterminate the Jews in Israel.
3) He holds the extermination of the European Jews during the Second World War to be a myth.
The first two grounds do not make much sense; only the third is serious and, for that reason, instructive.
In reply to the first ground, it’s fitting to observe that if Ahmadinejad’s accusers possessed the slightest evidence that Iran was trying to acquire nuclear weapons, such evidence would long since have been brandished before the world; however, up to now, they have supplied no real evidence.
In any case, if Iran had a nuclear bomb at her disposal, she could not launch it towards a geographic zone populated by as many Palestinians as Jews, since her bomb would kill or maim both populations without distinction.
The second bone of contention against Iran — that it seeks the extermination of the Jews in Israel — is without foundation. It rests on the absurd manipulation of a text. Ahmadinejad has had, and continues to have ascribed to him, an incendiary statement according to which the Jewish State is to be “wiped off the map”, words taken to mean the extermination of the Jews in Israel.
Actually, Ahadminejad had merely repeated (in 2005) Ayatollah Khomeini’s 1979 declaration that “the regime occupying Jerusalem” would one day “vanish from the page of time”. This was the repetition of someone else’s prediction, not a threat.
Ahmadinejad took care to spell out his phrase by specifying that, if all the inhabitants of the land of Palestine – Moslems, Jews and Christians – had the right one day to vote freely and opt for a regime of their choice, the Zionist regime would disappear from Palestine just as, for example, the Communist regime disappeared from Russia. The Western media, as a whole, have reported neither the exact wording nor the explanation.
PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD’S EXACT WORDS: “Imam ghoft een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad.” — “The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time“.
A literal word-for-word translation of the Farsi: Imam (Khomeini) ghoft (said) een (this) rezhim-e (regime) ishghalgar-e (occupying) qods (Jerusalem) bayad (must) az safheh-ye ruzgar (from page of time) mahv shavad (vanish from).
Note that the word MAP (nagsheh in Farsi) occurs nowhere in Ahmadinejad’s speech; nor do the words ISRAEL or WIPE OUT. The English translation “I want to wipe Israel off the map” is therefore much more than a mischievous mistranslation. It is a complete fabrication. [LD]
The third ground is the true one: if the Iranian president causes so much fear, it’s owing to his revisionism. He has wielded the sole weapon that can deeply worry the Jewish State and its ally, the United States.
He possesses what I’ve called the poor man’s atomic bomb. In the findings of historical revisionism, he effectively holds a “weapon of mass destruction” that would kill no one but could neutralize Israel’s number one political weapon: the Great Lie of the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of Europe’s Jews.
Raised in the religion of “the Holocaust”, the peoples of North America and Europe generally believe in this Great Lie and see Ahmadinejad as a heretic. Thus they dare not defend any policy of rapprochement with Iran, or call for a lifting of the boycott, although therein lies the only chance of seeing their energy costs decrease. Doubtless some of these peoples’ leaders desire an understanding with Iran, but they back away at the prospect of being criticized as accomplices of the new Satan, of the “denier”, the “negationist” who “kills the Jews once again by denying their death”.
The news of the international “Holocaust” conference in Tehran (December 11th—12th 2006) rang out like a warning shot. By no means reserved to revisionists, that conference was open to all. Confrontation of opposing views was allowed, and it took place. The rout of the anti-revisionists was dramatic. And President Ahmadinejad, already fully apprised of revisionist argumentation, was thus able to restate that “the Holocaust” was a myth.
Bush, Blair, Chirac, who know nothing of revisionism, responded by making a terrible fuss. As for the Israelis, they are aware of the Jewish authors’ utter inability to answer revisionist arguments on the scientific level; they now uphold their Great Lie only with Elie Wiesel-style fake testimony or cinematic guff in the manner of Claude Lanzmann, when they don’t resort to novels, drama or even sham museum exhibitions like those at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem or the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.
“SOME EVENTS DO TAKE PLACE BUT ARE NOT TRUE; OTHERS ARE, ALTHOUGH THEY NEVER OCCURRED.”
— Elie Wiesel, the world’s most famous Holocaust survivor and — some would claim — the world’s most widely acclaimed liar. “In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 persons to their deaths each day,” he lied. “I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”
Concerning Babi Yar, a place in Ukraine where the Germans executed Soviet citizens, Wiesel wrote of Jews being killed: “For month after month, the ground never stopped trembling; from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it.” (Reporting another witness to this miraculous event).
In 2007, Wiesel stated that President Ahmadinejad of Iran had openly admitted he wanted to nuke Israel into oblivion. “When he says he wants nuclear weapons to destroy the state of Israel, I must believe him,” Wiesel said.
The late Christopher Hitchens had no time for Wiesel and was not impressed by his Nobel Peace prize or his 76 honorary doctorates. “Is there a more contemptible poseur and windbag than Elie Wiesel?” he asked rhetorically. (The Nation, February 11, 2001).
Holocaust revisionism — i.e., any doubts about the official version of the Holocaust as laid down by the Zionists and their camp followers — is illegal in many parts of the world. Questioning the magic six million figure is now a “thought crime” which can get you sent to prison for several years in the following 17 countries: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Switzerland.
Here are two photos of the author of this article, Dr Robert Faurisson, after he was savagely beaten up by three Jewish fanatics for daring to question the sacred tenets of the Holocaust: namely, that 6 million Jews were killed in gas chambers on the orders of Hitler. To this day, not a single gas chamber has actually been seen by anyone. [LD]
The Zionists and their friends are getting more and more alarmed at the diffusion of revisionism over the Internet. They make many attempts, cynical or veiled, to strengthen Internet censorship but, up to today at any rate, they have not yet achieved their aims. Throughout the Western world repression of revisionism is worsening, but it’s all a waste of effort so far. The holocaustic propaganda and Shoah Business grow ever more deafening, but henceforth they tend to annoy or tire people.
The Zionists have therefore seized the occasion to draw up a bill in the Knesset that would let the State of Israel demand that any revisionist, wherever in the world he might be, be delivered to its own courts!
When there’s no proof to show, the cudgel is used.
Herman Rosenblatt and his wife Roma, smirking contentedly after having conned the world into accepting their fake Holocaust memoir Angel at the Fence. TV celeb Oprah Winfrey was taken in by their touching concentration camp romance and gushed breathlessly, “This is the single greatest love story we’ve ever told on the air!” Asked why he had lied, Mr Rosenblatt explained, “I wanted to bring happiness to people.” Despite the book being a proven fake, a $25 million blockbuster movie is now being made by Jewish producer Harris Salomon.
Rosenblatt’s fake memoir is one in a long series of Holocaust hoaxes, some of them even more flamboyantly absurd. e.g., the case of Misha the Wolf Girl who was raised by wolves and fed on raw meat like a wolf cub — a story that netted her over $20 million and was also made into a movie. Nor are matters made any better when we learn that Holocaust scams are frequent, with thousands of fraudulent claims being made every year by bogus “survivors”, costing Germany and other countries tens of millions of dollars. In one case alone, Germany was cheated out of $42 million. All this blatant dishonesty by unscrupulous Jews — to quote a Jewish friend of mine — “only brings the Holocaust into disrepute and gives ammunition to the Holocaust deniers.”
This, then, is the “secret weapon” against Israel that Iran wields so effectively — a weapon far deadlier than all of Israel’s 200-300 nuclear warheads: Holocaust truth. If the truth about the Holocaust should ever turn out to be what historical revisionists and millions of other increasingly skeptical people think it is — a spectacular hoax to prop up Zionism and give the Jewish state a semblance of legitimacy — Israel’s days are numbered.
It is for this reason that Israel is perhaps so desperate to destroy Iran: to silence it before the truth gets out. (LD)
Body parts horror affair explodes days before Halloween
Israel doesn’t celebrate Halloween, a mainly American horror show. Yet, days before Halloween 2012 a body parts horror affair exploded in Tel Aviv. Sensitive places in Israel are often headed by people with a special loyalty to the system, who are rewarded with unnaturally long service terms. The best example—reviewed in detail in Israel Military Censor hits the USA—is the Military Censor. A regular post of an IDF officer lasts two years. Yet, Avner Bar-On served as Military Censor in 1951-1953 and 1955-1977. Yitzhak Shani served between 1977 and 2000. The current censor has been in office since 2005. This is highly irregular and allows such officials to accumulate immense power. The same is true for Israel’s National Center of Forensic Medicine in Abu Kabir, Jaffa. Formally within Tel Aviv, this institution is the only place in Israel authorized to conduct autopsies in cases of unnatural death. Among others, it means it treats all cases of deaths in violent events, like suicide bombings. Hence, it is closely related to the security services establishment. In cases of notable figures, the reports of the institute carry political consequences; thus, the state favors trustworthy people serving long-terms there. Since 1988 until yesterday—October 15, 2012—the center was headed by Professor Yehuda Hiss. During this minor-eon, he carried high-profile autopsies on Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Rachel Corrie, and prominent Israelis like media-stars Shosh Atari and Dudu Topaz.
|Litzman and Hiss|
| Yarkon Cemetery
Many of Hiss crimes were buried here
Professor Hiss had been awarded a fiefdom by the state. Due to his position as director of the center, he served also in the Department of Pathology for the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at Tel Aviv University and professor at the Terrorism and Medicine Program at the Institute for Counter-Terrorism at IDC Herzliya. In other words, he was an apparently respectable member of the Israeli Administration. He paid with extreme loyalty. The most famous example of the liberties he took in his job in order to please the always-demanding state was the autopsy of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. The Hiss report claims that after Rabin was shot and rushed to nearby Ichilov Hospital, he died on the operating table of blood loss and a punctured lung within forty minutes; this supports Israeli secret police Shin Beth wishes. This report was challenged in March 1999 by a group of Israeli academics. The problem is that different official reports describe different wounds, while failing to explain why it took Rabin twenty-two minutes to arrive by car to a hospital which by foot is less than five minutes away from the assassination scene. In court, the Shin Beth admitted to having delivered an agent provocateur—Avishai Raviv, “Agent Champagne”—to trick Yigal Amir, who was found guilty of the assassination. Professor Hiss whitewashed all forensic evidence in his report and happily kept accumulating a large state pension.
Apparently, nothing could disturb his pleasant career.
Israel National Center of Forensic Medicine | Abu Kabir, Jaffa
An Israeli Golem
Accurate translations from Hebrew to English are difficult. One of the reasons is the completely different structure of the verb system. For example, most Hebrew nouns are also verbs in the present tense. The richness added by this to their meaning is absent in their English counterparts. This is what happens with the word “golem.” Golem occurs once in the Bible in Psalm 139:16, where “golmi” (Hebrew nouns can be conjugated, “golmi” is related to “golem” in a way that cannot be easily translated into English) means “unshaped.” However, the Hebrew noun also implies action; the creation of this shapeless form. It has an inherent mystic meaning which doesn’t exist in the English noun. The Mishna expanded the use of the term to refer to an uncultivated person, while the Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin 38b) claims that Adam was initially created as a golem when his dust was “kneaded into a shapeless husk.” From here on, the term evolved within the mystic circles of Judaism (see Israel is a Golem for details), which tried to create a “golem.” Essentially, “golem” refers to either a mythical Frankenstein-like creature or to a dumb person. Professor Hiss falls into both categories at once.
|Shosh and Gali Atari|
Hiss was dumb—“golem”—enough to ruin his career by collecting the body-parts of the people he autopsied, an act that contradicts Israeli law. The abovementioned Shosh Atari died of kidney transplant complications; parts of her body remained at the center, where Professor Hiss occasionally enjoyed looking at them. After he was fired, it was disclosed that he had a collection of them belonging to over eight-thousand bodies. This is forbidden by Jewish Laws, which regulate autopsies and burial in Israel. One should be buried with all body parts. Moreover, Professor Hiss is involved in apparent cases of organ harvesting. In 1998, Scottish Alistair Sinclair was arrested in Israel on suspicion of dealing in drugs. He hanged himself in a holding cell at Ben Gurion International Airport. Hiss performed an autopsy and the body was returned to his family. A second autopsy performed at the University of Glasgow found that the heart and a small bone at the base of his tongue were missing. Israel claimed the bone was needed for the investigation; the missing heart was never properly explained. In November 1999, the Tel Aviv newspaper Ha’ir stated that medical students under Hiss’ direction practiced on bodies sent there for autopsy, and that body parts were transferred for transplant without permission from the families concerned. In January 2001, Israel’s largest newspaper Yediot Aharonot claimed that Hiss had been involved in “organ sales” of body parts to universities and medical schools for research and training, citing evidence which included price listings for various body parts.
Despite these horrors, Hiss felt safe. After all, Israel is known for its medical horrors. I reviewed some of them in detail in Israel’s Eugenics Program: Dr. Mengele Blues, where eugenic programs conducted by Israel and dating back to the Nazi Regime (doctors practicing it there imported it to Israel after WWII) are wild violations of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The State of Israel knows that while it continues denouncing Nazi crimes, no nation will dare to criticize it for its equally horrendous crimes. Hiss knew this and felt safe with his own perversion.
In his post since 1988, Professor Hiss failed to notice that Israel had changed; body parts blocked his view. The ongoing investigation against him for the abovementioned events had no chance of leading anywhere; he was backed by the Shin Beth and the secular establishment. However, Israel is not a secular-Zionist bastion anymore. Ultra-orthodox Jews—Haredim and Hasidim—are constantly gaining political power. As time goes by, they are beginning to exercise it in order to conquer new segments of the Israeli society. Nowadays, Yaakov Litzman leads Agudat Israel, a Haredi party, which is in the Knesset as part of the United Torah Judaism. He serves in Netanyahu’s government as Deputy Minister of Health. Needless to say, the odd practices of Hiss are not to the liking of the Haredim. He took advantage of the January 2013 elections and fired Hiss. Netanyahu will need Litzman for his next coalition government and thus wouldn’t dare to ruin his relations with him in order to save Hiss. Israel’s Night of the Long Knives is on, in an odd version where the only choice is “trick,” and body parts are for real.
SHALOM FOLKS….I will Smell and Know a Good Jew when I will see one, meantime, PLEASE, You out there, put up with these SERPENTS BREEDING IN SEWERS.
Miko Peled Seattle. Oct. 1, 2012
October 15, 2012
The son of an Israeli general and staunch Zionist, Miko Peled, peace activist and campaigner for Palestinian rights speaks in Seattle early October
I’ve sat on my bed at 3 am in the morning for years praying to the deaf gods. I used to fire hearing aids at them in the hope of a solid, accurate and timely reply. For years I didn’t understand why that did not work, then I realized I had not put batteries in the hearing aids. TWIT.
Seriously though, one day recently I saw a golden arch over my head made up of gold rings interlinked. Since then I’ve been able to get through and get an accurate response about six hours after posing a question. I don’t ask many as I don’t want to push my luck.
The ghouls have been beaten back and so now the line is ever clearer with everyday that passes.
Two nights ago I asked about the war In Iran as I was concerned about food shortages, I saw a crystal clear vision of Jesus with his finger up. His hand a bit lower than in this pic here, I heard the word “Wait”. So I reckon the war is not on as yet. No need to panic.
I don’t think the Jews will attack Iran on their own, they have been threatening it for ten years or more, and they haven’t done diddly-squat so far, they need the Americans to fight for them, it’s so sad the Yanks go and die in wars that are nothing to do with them.
The Psychopaths will Destroy Themselves in the End
Romney has promised war and Obama may go in to help the Jews, but only after the election in November. It’s all very troubling but this is the age of the psychopaths.
Meanwhile there is a Third Force developing, I’ll write about it more in detail, it’s the American military. They may not back Obama and the Zionists, there are new developments. The military are pro-America and pro the Constitution, and they are anti the Zionists, and the bent Illuminati bankers, and they are also against Obama, who in fact is their supreme commander. Interesting eh?
If the military mount a coup d’ etat in Washington, that will solve things over night. Peace at last. Stuart Wilde
But Wait !..Did you heard about the Cosmic/Universe Third Force ?, Karma / Human Shadow, and
World Destiny ????? , Gaia and/or Earth Changes , or, such things as The Third Force which is The US
Indeed is TRUE, and they exists….Check it out folks.
The Third Force–The US Military
I’ve talked recently of personal karma and how each of us is in our national karma as well. Watching America is vital to our destiny in the western world, as we’re all linked to what happens there.
The First Force is the citizens of America. They work hard and pay their taxes and go to church, they are mostly Christians. They are the most generous donators to overseas aid and to charities in the world.
The Second Force is the Israelis in the US government. Sixteen US government agencies including the CIA and the NSA etc published a report called “Preparing for a Post Israel Middle East.”
Click for full story http://www.texemarrs.com/102012/sixteen_intelligence_agencies.htm
Statue of Liberty. Paul Joseph Watson – Infowars.com realnewsreporter.com
In it, they claim there are 7500 Israeli operatives (spies) in the US government, and of course the Zionists control the media, the Congress and the White House, and they control Romney who has pledged to send America to war against Iran for them.
The Mormons believe they are from the 12 tribes of Israel, they claim they are from the tribes of Ephraim and Manassas. How they evolved/migrated from the Middle East 2000 years ago to the Utah desert today is not explained. What people believe is so crazy.
Now a Third Force has emerged, the American military. They are American loyalists, they support the Constitution, which has been violated by Obama and the Zionists in Congress (Carl Levin bought in the NDAA, detention without trial law), and the military is anti the Zionists, who they believe have maliciously and secretly taken over America and bought in laws that hurt American people violating the Constitution.
The US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey made a speech last week saying if Israel attacks he’s not sending the military in to help.
Veteran’s Today ran an article by Dr. Alan Sabrosky a graduate of the War College, in which he says he’s 100% sure 9/11 was done by Israel. There was an Israeli-American comptroller Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who was in charge of the finances at the Defense Department at the time of 9/11. (See the extraordinary Zakheim video below).